A recent sentence, an earlier fatal incident

HSE reported on 6 October 2026 that a sole trader received a suspended prison sentence following a trainee painter’s fatal electrocution near Chester. The incident happened on 29 July 2024 while a ladder was being moved near overhead power lines. These are separate dates: this week’s development is the court outcome.

According to HSE, the trader pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. Warrington Magistrates Court imposed 16 weeks’ imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, and £10,645 in costs on 6 October. HSE’s investigation found shortcomings in planning, supervision, equipment selection and competence.

Look beyond the working position

HSE’s overhead power lines guidance explains that electricity can flash over when a person or object gets too close; physical contact is not necessary. It identifies long equipment, including ladders and scaffold poles, among the risks. Its planning advice covers lines within or beside the work area and across access routes.

Harvtec’s interpretation is that reviewing only the place where someone will paint, repair or inspect leaves an important question unanswered: how will people and equipment get there? Managers should ask whether the assessment covers the whole job, including movements between working positions.

Resolve the site constraints before booking the work

HSE advises consulting the owners of overhead lines about the proposed plan and allowing sufficient time for precautions. Lines should be assumed live unless their owners establish otherwise. A short job still needs appropriate precautions; brevity does not remove the hazard.

For Cornwall businesses commissioning outdoor maintenance, a proportionate next step is to identify overhead-line constraints during the initial discussion with the contractor. Record who will obtain the line owner’s advice and who will confirm that the work arrangements address it. Unresolved constraints should be settled before work is authorised.

Treat equipment and supervision as one decision

HSE’s introduction to working at height requires proper planning, supervision, competent people and suitable equipment. It places avoiding work at height first where reasonably practicable, followed by preventing falls and reducing remaining consequences. Equipment choice therefore belongs within the assessment of the task and site.

A useful management review brings those decisions together: does the proposed method suit the location, do those involved have the necessary competence, and is supervision clear? If the method changes, revisit those questions. A plan should remain relevant to the work being authorised, rather than simply describe the original intention.

Check the evidence

Sources & further reading

The reporting above is attributed to its source. Practical interpretation is PULSE’s. This is general information, not a site-specific assessment or safety sign-off.

No material corrections recorded. Tell us about an error, quoting this article’s title.